Inter-comparison of absorbed dose to water in a Co-60 therapy beam using IAEA and HPA protocols

Abstract

The absorbed dose water in a Co-60 teletherapy beam has ch^hmeaSUr<?- Whh f°Ur diffcrent stan^ard ionisation chambers applying two codes of practice and also, with a *5? l2Slmeter" Measured values agree generally within ' Th^re 1S a remarkable agreement of less than 0.3% vanation, between ionisation chambers NE 2561 and NE 2481 when the IAEA protocol is applied. The HPA protocol is applicable to only NE 2561 and a variation of about 1.4% was observed between measurements made with this ionisation chamber applying the two protocols. The IAEA protocol shows very accurate results. With a deviation of about 2.2%, the Frickle dosimeter appears to be the least accurate for therapy dose measurement despite its simplicity of application